Showing posts with label sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sports. Show all posts

Sports Greatness: Baseball Edition Part Two

    A few months ago I did a post about the National League, today I will discuss the American League.  For a reminder, this is the first thought that pops into my head when I think about a team.  Could be a player, or moment.

    New York Yankees
    Mickey Mantle.  I know, it is the Yankees and there are about 1200 things that could pop into your head and you could make a strong argument for all of them.  However, when I was a kid, a relative of mine had a Mickey Mantle baseball card (not his rookie card, but like his fourth or fifth year card) and it was worth a few grand.  I always hoped to somehow go through a family members attic and find Mantle's rookie card, which when I was a kid was worth something like $40,000. 

    I read before that Mantle hit some of the longest home runs in the history of baseball.  Granted, the figures were not as accurate as today, but still pretty damn impressive.  Also, check out his stats.  

    Plus, I loved the movie 61* and the way you see how Mantle abused his body by going out partying every night. 

    Boston Red Sox
    Another team with so many great moments.  Before last year, I would probably have mentioned two things:  the come back against the Yankees or them trying to trade for Alex Rodriguez (and then crying when the Yankees got him).  Fortunately, last year had this moment, which will always be the first thing I think of when I heard Red Sox.
    Baltimore Orioles
    I went to a game at Camden Yard back in 1999, which honestly should be the first thing that comes to mind, however that is not the case.  I always remember the trivia question "Name the four 20-game winners for Orioles in 1971."  Actually, I never can remember the answer.  I usually get three of them (oddly enough, not always the same three).  The answer is:
    Mike Cuellar
    Pat Dobson
    Jim Palmer
    Dave McNally

    Seriously, this is a fun bar trivia question to ask someone older who is a baseball fan.  If you can remember the answer, they are impressed.

    Toronto Blue Jays
    Joe Carter...

    Suck it Philly!!!

    Tampa Bay Rays
    I like Evan Longoria.  Seriously, I wish the Pirates had a player like him (to be fair, they have McCutchen, he is like Longoria--I wish Pedro was like Evan).  He is a fantastic player and he just seems so damn cool.  Yeah, I think I have a man-crush on him.  Whatever, deal with it.

    Fun fact:  when he came into the league, I thought he was the sister of actress Eva Longoria.  Nope, they are not related.

    Minnesota Twins
    I will always remember the Twins beating the Atlanta Braves in the 1991 World Series.  The Braves beat the Pirates in '91 NLCS in seven games, but not nearly as dramatic as the 1992 series.  I hated the stupid braves and was so happy to see the Twins win the game.
     
    Detroit Tigers
    C'mon, when people talk about crazy things players do nowadays, I like to point out Ty Cobb.  This guy did all of the insane things people hate back in the 1900s.  He sat out games to win a batting title (and do not worry, apparently Nap Lajoie had a bunch of bunt singles to try and beat Cobb, and since the opposing team hated Cobb, they played their third baseman deep).  He beat up fans, he was considered a jerk by all his peers.

    He also set most of the records for a hitter and still has the highest career average.  And he held the AL record for total bases in a game until the other night when Josh Hamilton broke it.  Why did he have that record?  He wanted to prove that hitting home runs was not that hard and if he wanted to, he could hit more than Babe Ruth.  Instead, he liked hitting for a high average.

    Hell, just look at that slide/flying jump kick...

    Chicago White Sox
    Speaking of old time players.  I was fascinated by the Black Sox Scandal of 1919 when I was a kid.  I could not read enough about it.  I always thought that Shoeless Joe Jackson got a raw deal.  I mean, just look at his stats from that series.  Does it really look like he was not trying?

    Cleveland Indians
    When you mention the Indians, how can you not think of the film Major League?  Hell, this clip pretty much sums up how you feel when you watch a Pirates game.



    Also, I was at an Indian's game a few years ago at Jacobs Field.  Unfortunately, I do not remember much of the game.

    Kansas City Royals
    If there is a team that is as pathetic as the Pirates, it is the Royals.  And just imagine if you allowed them to play...yep, it was as bad as it sounds.  Just check out WHYGAVS liveblog of one of their games.  I recommend reading the whole thing and the comments with it.

    I remember reading it while the game was happening and almost pissing myself laughing.  Back before the days of twitter...

    Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
    That should be my memory.  The number of times they have changed the name.  Los Angeles Angels, Anaheim Angels, California Angels...whatever, we get it.

    I will always associate Jim Abbott with the Angels.  Dude was born with one hand and still became a major league pitcher.  Yeah, makes you feel good about your life.

    Plus, if I remember correctly, he was one of those guys who made the majors without spending a day in the minors.

    Texas Rangers
    Josh Hamilton.  I hope he signs a long-term contract with them.  He is the positive story we all love to hear in sports.  I think you all know it by now.  Oh, did I mention that the dude can absolutely destroy a baseball?

    Oakland Athletics
    The Bash Brothers!  Jose Canseco and Mark McGwire.  Huh, who would have guessed they were slightly juiced up...

    Seattle Mariners
    I think about all the really good players they have had at one point and yet they never won a World Series.  They won 116 games back in 2001.

    Alex Rodriguez, Ken Griffey Jr., Ichiro, Randy Johnson, Jaime Moyer, John Olerud, and Jay Buhner all played for this team (not all at the same time).  Just crazy when you think about it.  Imagine if they had kept A-Rod and Griffey (maybe he stays healthy in Seattle)...

    Anyways, those are my thoughts.  Soon I will move to a different sport.  Leave your own thoughts/memories/players in the comments.

Pittsburgh Sports Stuff

    AJ Burnett and the DH Debate
    As most of you know, Burnett injured his eye socket during a bunting drill and will probably miss some time.   Last night, I heard one of the guys on 93.7 The Fan saying that if the NL had the DH, then this would not have happened.

    He made a good point that it seems like MLB will probably push towards a DH in both leagues over time, especially now that there is expanded interleague play starting next season.  He kept saying that owners want the DH because they do not want their investments hurt doing something that is not necessary for them.  Although, what if Albert Pujols trips over first base after hitting his first home run with the Angels, destroying his knee and missing the entire season?  Wouldn't we find it ridiculous if the Angels owner started saying that running the bases after a home run should be removed from the game?

    This got me thinking about the DH and whether or not I would actually care if the NL started using it.  Then I had a brilliant idea:  at the beginning of the game, have a coin toss, the manager that calls it correctly gets to choose whether or not they will use the DH.  Before you laugh, think about the strategy for a second.

    -If you are playing against a team with a dominant ace, say Justin Verlander, you may want to elect not to use the DH.  That way if it is close, the Tigers might have to pull him earlier than they would like in order to pinch hit.

    -You can force a team to make a tough decision about their lineup.  Using the Tigers again, they may have to keep Fielder on the bench in order to have a stronger defense behind them.  Or if they do go with Cabrera at third base, a team could try and take advantage of a weakened infield.

    -If a team has a pitcher with a little pop in their bat, they may want to elect to allow him to hit.  Zambrano (back in his good pitching days) comes to mind, or maybe Micah Owings.  I especially like the idea if a team has a monster hitter who really cannot field.

    -There would also be major strategy changes in building a team.  Obviously there are not enough elite power hitters to go around for every team.  I think you would start to see teams employ more one-dimensional players who just crush balls or strikeout.

    If Bud Selig decides to institute a league-wide designated-hitter, then I hope he stops by here to read this and use my coin-toss idea.

    Hines Ward
    The Steelers decided to part ways with everyone's favorite wide receiver, Hines Ward.  I honestly wish he would just retire, but instead he will go to another team and most likely play about half the season before being cut.

    One thing I will never understand though is the way some Steelers fans never see any fault in Ward.  The guy has been voted the most dirty player in the league by his peers a few years in a row, yet Steelers fans say that he is just hard-nosed.  If a Raven played like him, they would hate that guy.  I guess that is the way it is with all teams though.

    The other big question is whether or not Ward deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.  I am going to say yes.  I think he gets in, but it takes a few tries.

    Greatest Games
    On Mike and Mike this morning they were discussing Wilt Chamberlain's 100-point game.  They were asking the question if that was the greatest single game ever.  They mentioned Don Larsen's perfect game in the World Series as probably the greatest performance in a game ever.  I actually cannot argue with this one.

    Unfortunately, they started naming other great things and they immediately went outside of team sports.  They never once mentioned hockey.  I am sure there have been some amazing hockey game performances.  the one that came to mind immediately was Mario Lemieux's five goals in different ways (shorthanded, full strength, power play, penalty shot, and empty net).  I just think that one is cool.

    I can imagine Gretzky had some amazing games as well.  Or what about some goalie performances?  It just boggles my mind that ESPN does not even try to pretend to care about hockey.

Sports Greatness: Baseball Edition Part One

    The other day I was listening to the radio and heard the sports guys talking about Kobe Bryant surpassing Magic Johnson as the greatest Laker of all time.  This got me to thinking about who the greatest players are from each team.  Then it got me thinking about something else.  When you think of a sports team, what is the first thing that pops into your head?

    That is what this list is, so please do not comment that Player X is the greatest for that team or that I am forgetting some other moment, blah blah blah.  If you want to list your own, do so in the comments.

    Today, we shall do the National League of baseball...

    Pittsburgh Pirates
    This is my favorite team.  So obviously plenty of things stick out for me.  When I think about the Pirates though, there is one player that will always stand out:  Andy Van Slyke.  He was my favorite player as a kid.  I had all of his cards, I even had every magazine I could find with interviews with him.

    Atlanta Braves
    Pure hatred.  When I think of them, I see Sid Bream sliding home.  I remember being upset about the Pirates losing and my dad telling me not to worry that we would get 'em next year.  Ugh.  How wrong those words were...


    Philadelphia Phillies
    Mike Schmidt.  That dude had a great mustache.  A close second for me is Lenny Dykstra.  My cousin always argued that he was better than Van Slyke.

    New York Mets
    My friend James.  I never know what is worse, the Pirates ridiculous long losing streak or being a fan of a team that comes close, but never actually wins.  I will always associate the Mets with watching Carlos Beltran strike out against the Cardinals and also seeing James' face as it happened.  Dude was heartbroken.


    Chicago Cubs
    Ryne Sandberg.  Not only was he a great second baseman, but his son had probably one of the funniest interviews during an All Star game.  The kid is there to watch his dad and they ask him the usual questions, then the interviewer notices the kid has a gold necklace with a number 23 on it.  He asks "oh, do you wear that for your dad?"  The kid responds "no, my favorite player is Michael Jordan."


    St. Louis Cardinals
    Bob Gibson.  One of the most dominant and downright nasty pitchers of all time.  Hell, MLB had to change the rules after his 1968 season.  Actually, that always reminds me of how MLB will fiddle with rules in order to help attendance.  They raised the mound in the early 1960s which led to pitcher dominance, then had to shrink the strike zone to help hitters out.  Read about the rule changes sometime, it is quite funny.

    Houston Astros
    The look on Brad Lidge's face when Albert Pujols decided to hit a ball that is somewhere in space right now.

    Cincinnati Reds
    The 1990 World Series when the mighty Oakland A's got swept by the Reds.  I remember this series because I thought the A's would easily win it.  This taught me a valuable lesson:  anything can happen in baseball.

    San Francisco Giants
    Speaking of World Series'...I will always remember what I told my dad when he asked me who I thought would win game three.  I said something like "no one, the game is going to be cancelled due to an earthquake."  Yep, I predicted that one...and no that does not make me at all special.

    Los Angeles Dodgers
    Jackie Robinson.  I do not think I need to really explain this one.

    San Diego Padres
    The first game I ever went to was at Three Rivers Stadium against the Padres.  I was five years old.  My entire family went as a large group and if I remember correctly, we were there for the entire series.  We used to do that a few different times during my youth.  Anyways, my mom and aunts went to the Padres dugout and bugged the players until they tossed them some balls (haha that is funny sounding).  I had a ball from the Padres, which I lost a few years later because I was an idiot and used it during a pickup game of baseball.  Exactly like The Sandlot!

    Colorado Rockies
    Dante Bichette.  Mainly because of that awesome name, but also because he is embodiment of someone who benefited from playing in Denver.

    Florida Marlins
    Winning the 1997 World Series was pretty impressive, but winning a second one in 2003 was craziness.  Especially since they did it against the mighty Yankees and their endless payroll.  Also, the first time they did it by building a team with cash, this time they did it with their young players acquired during the previous firesale.

    Arizona Diamondbacks
    Luis Gonzalez single during game seven of the 2001 World Series.  As I have stated many times before, I stopped watching baseball in 1994 because of the strike.  The McGwire/Sosa home run chase brought me back a little bit, then the Subway Series brought me mostly back.  '01 was pretty much the first year that I really got back into baseball. This was a fantastic series to watch.

    Washington Nationals
    Adam Dunn crushing a ball against the Pirates.  Yep, I went to see the Pirates/Nationals the night after Stephen Strasburg made his debut.  Whatever, I saw his debut in Altoona. 

    Milwaukee Brewers
    Screw them.  I try to block them out.

    Stay tuned for the American League.

Interceptions and My Idiotic Perception

     The other night I was out with Jason and we were having a discussion about quarterbacks.  I made a comment about how I think defensive backs will eventually benefit from this new passing heavy league.  My idea was that if there more passes being thrown, then it should make sense that there will be more interceptions.  Jason argued with me and feels that it is a horrible time for defensive backs.

    I figured (and I think towards the end of a very long rant that Jason agreed with me) that if QBs are throwing way more passes and the rate of interceptions stays relatively the same over time, that there should be more total interceptions.  My reasoning was that if you looked back at the old days, there were less passes thrown, but aside from a few outliers, interception numbers would probably be pretty low as well.

    I was completely wrong.  I am actually shocked by what I found.  Here is the data:  INT is interceptions, the next column is interceptions per team per game, the next one is pass attempts, after that we have pass attempts per team per game, and last we have the percentage of passes thrown for interception (or interception per attempt).




    Year INT INT/Tm/Gm Pass Attempts PA/Tm/Gm Int/Attempt
    2011 506 0.9882 17410 34.0039 2.9064%
    2010 511 0.9980 17269 33.7285 2.9591%
    2009 525 1.0254 17033 33.2676 3.0823%
    2008 465 0.9082 16526 32.2773 2.8137%
    2007 720 1.4063 17045 33.2910 4.2241%
    2006 520 1.0156 16389 32.0098 3.1729%
    2005 506 0.9883 16464 32.1563 3.0734%
    2004 524 1.0234 16354 31.9414 3.2041%
    2003 538 1.0508 16493 32.2129 3.2620%
    2002 528 1.0313 17292 33.7734 3.0534%
    2001 545 1.0988 16181 32.6230 3.3681%
    2000 634 1.2782 16322 32.9073 3.8843%
    1999 562 1.1331 16760 33.7903 3.3532%
    1998 509 1.0604 15489 32.2688 3.2862%
    1997 479 0.9979 15729 32.7688 3.0453%
    1996 542 1.1292 15966 33.2625 3.3947%
    1995 512 1.0667 16699 34.7896 3.0661%
    1994 474 1.0580 15056 33.6071 3.1482%
    1993 469 1.0469 14414 32.1741 3.2538%
    1992 519 1.1585 13408 29.9286 3.8708%
    1991 488 1.0893 13950 31.1384 3.4982%
    1990 480 1.0714 13516 30.1696 3.5513%
    1989 559 1.2478 14338 32.0045 3.8987%
    1988 553 1.2344 14131 31.5424 3.9134%
    1987 540 1.2054 13491 30.1138 4.0027%
    1986 581 1.2969 14469 32.2969 4.0155%
    1985 602 1.3438 14423 32.1942 4.1739%
    1984 584 1.3036 14325 31.9754 4.0768%
    1983 620 1.3839 14047 31.3549 4.4138%
    1982 349 1.3849 7933 31.4802 4.3993%
    1981 609 1.3594 14180 31.6518 4.2948%
    1980 627 1.3996 13705 30.5915 4.5750%
    1979 597 1.3326 12979 28.9710 4.5997%
    1978 639 1.4263 11829 26.4040 5.4020%
    1977 562 1.4337 9786 24.9643 5.7429%
    1976 497 1.2679 10260 26.1735 4.8441%
    1975 533 1.4643 9973 27.3984 5.3444%
    1974 500 1.3736 9609 26.3984 5.2035%
    1973 470 1.2912 8845 24.2995 5.3137%
    1972 480 1.3187 9011 24.7555 5.3268%
    1971 544 1.4945 9412 25.8571 5.7799%
    1970 510 1.4011 9796 26.9121 5.2062%
    1969 544 1.4945 10377 28.5082 5.2424%
    1968 554 1.5220 10034 27.5659 5.5212%
    1967 593 1.6943 10329 29.5114 5.7411%
    1966 535 1.5923 10090 30.0298 5.3023%
    1965 480 1.5584 9059 29.4123 5.2986%
    1964 501 1.6266 9187 29.8279 5.4534%
    1963 514 1.6688 8954 29.0714 5.7405%
    1962 567 1.8409 8812 28.6104 6.4344%
    1961 564 1.8312 8922 28.9675 6.3215%
    1960 493 1.8396 7813 29.1530 6.3100%
    1959 221 1.5347 3714 25.7917 5.9505%
    1958 243 1.6874 3951 27.4375 6.1503%
    1957 231 1.6042 3339 23.1875 6.9182%
    1956 240 1.6667 3282 22.7917 7.3126%
    1955 258 1.7917 3820 26.5278 6.7539%
    1954 294 2.0417 4232 29.3889 6.9471%
    1953 306 2.1250 4267 29.6319 7.1713%
    1952 297 2.0625 4024 27.9444 7.3807%
    1951 288 2.0000 3881 26.9514 7.4208%
    1950 343 2.1987 4307 27.6090 7.9638%

    I realize it looks like a lot to digest, so I was nice and made some graphs.







    A few quick notes:  1982 was a shortened season, only nine games were played.  From 2011-2002 there were 32 teams that played 16 games.  From 2001-1999 there were 31 teams.  1998-1995 30 teams.  1994-1978 28 teams.  1977-1976 28 teams playing 14 games.  1975-1970 26 teams playing 14 games.  1969-1960 was the AFL-NFL times (I had to combine the numbers, the majority of the time they both played 14 games, except in 1960 when the NFL only played 12 games).  From 1959-1951 there were 12 teams playing 12 games and in 1950 there were 13 teams that played 12 games.

    Here is the interesting thing, the number interceptions has stayed pretty steady since the 1960s.  In fact, as the number of attempts increases over time, the rate of interceptions decreases.  To me that seems pretty crazy, but I guess it should make sense if you take into consideration that coaches must know what they are doing.  I mean, if all these QBs were pretty crappy, they probably would want them to continuing throwing less.  Also, there are the rule changes to take into consideration.  I am not about to go that deep into this.

    I am shocked that coaches passed at all in the 1950s, teams were averaging two interceptions per game and there was almost an 8% chance of an attempt being picked off.

    I guess being a defensive back in this era must really suck.