Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

Weigh-In Wednesday XIII

    This morning I weighed in at 178, which is pretty good considering that the majority of vacation was spent eating great food and drinking plenty of beer.

    For those of you who care about these sort of things, check out these articles about scientists seeing light from a boiling planet.  I find this stuff fascinating. 

Cool Video



    This video is very cool.  I found it at Bad Astronomy.  The video comes from Norway, which looks like a pretty cool place to visit.  Just watch it and do not judge me for enjoying stuff.

Ancient Aliens Ridiculousness

    The last two episodes of Ancient Aliens have been even more idiotic than usual.  I love that they use the same six locations/incidents as proof and they just try to reanalyze it each episode.  One of these episodes focused on Pumapunku, which is a pre-Incan site in Bolivia.  You may recognize it as the place with these giant H-blocks.
    Needless to say, Ancient Alien Theorists believe this place was built by aliens.  The place was built with immense precision and David Chidress shows us this precision by taking a square and showing how the cuts are exactly 90 degrees.  Except, if you watch him, he puts the square against the block and you can see that the square is not even close to being exact.  I am not taking anything away from the ancient engineers, but if you are claiming an advanced race made these blocks and they are not 100% exact, I am not buying it.

    Speaking of David Childress...who is this guy?  He comes off as some expert in archaeology, but unfortunately, he actually has no real credentials.  He spent one year at a university.  He writes books about this crap and people consider him an expert.  Makes me laugh. 

    Another thing the AAT kept pointing to was the fact that inside these granite blocks, there are holes drilled into them.  They claim that these holes must have been cut with some kind of drill from the future.  Maybe a hypersonic drill.  Do you know why they claim this?  When they had an expert look at the cuts, he said there was no evidence of any kind of mechanical tool used, that the markings were typical of some kind of hand tool.  Granted, the guy said that he did not think they were made with the known tools of that society at that time. 

    Naturally, the AAT people came to the conclusion that they must have used something that we do not have yet.  Instead of trying to find a reasonable explanation, they went out and said "oh, it must be a hypersonic laser drill from Space Home Depot."

    One of the theories regarding how the ancient folks moved these blocks the 10 KM up into the mountains says that the people used trees as rollers.  The AAT people say that this is impossible because there are no trees up that high.  Umm, this is true, but there are trees near the actual quarry site.  It would seem to make more sense to lay the rollers as you go, not backwards.  Or you can claim that they were levitated there by aliens.  Yep, that makes more sense. 

    The AAT also claim that the granite is flat, which is proof that it was worked by aliens.  I am not a geologist, but I could have sworn that I heard in some science class once that granite can be naturally flat.  I have no clue whether or not the quarry where the large stones came from actually is one of those sites that produces relatively flat blocks.  However, that would probably be what I would look into.

    My favorite part of the episode involved a reconstruction of what the site must have looked like.  They theorize that these blocks must have interconnected to either become a landing pad or a launch ramp.  Allow me to explain this for a second.

    These aliens travel millions of light-years, they have a technology that allows them to basically bend the laws of physics.  They either have to create wormholes, which would take an enormous amount of energy, or maybe the discovered something that travels faster than light.  Even though these things sound super improbable, stay with me.

    They get to Earth and the first thing they do is build a landing port made out of granite.  They do not have some kind of material or portable landing pad?  Why would they need a launch ramp?  If they made it here, would they really need to build a granite launch pad?  They would not come prepared?

    Another idea is that they used Pumapunku as a base camp.  Again, I ask why build such a massive structure?  When our military went to Iraq, they did not start building a ziggurat to house the troops.  Nor did they start making tents out of animal hides like the Bedouin use.  No, they brought their own portable camps with them.  You mean to tell me that aliens would not have tents?  Or some awesome pop up building? 

    The reason the H-blocks are no longer in place is because it appears that an earthquake may have hit the area at some point.  Or, if you are an AAT:  aliens destroyed the site with lasers (or a meteor) before they left.  Yet, I would think if they fired some super energy weapon at their own base camp that we would see some evidence.  Right?  Heat marks on the blocks?  What if they used a meteor?  I would hope there would be some evidence.

    Or maybe there was a cosmic battle and another alien group came and destroyed the base.  After they destroyed the base though, they flew back there and picked up all the dead aliens and dropped weapons.  The wreckage was cleaned up thoroughly and to this day there is no proof of this epic battle.

    The last episode focused on Bigfoot.  Yep, Bigfoot.  The AAT claim that there is a connection between UFO sightings and Bigfoot.  There probably is a connection.  Crazy people who think they see Bigfoot, whenever they see a bear, probably identify a plane as an UFO as well.

    I was actually somewhat excited about this episode since I actually like watching Bigfoot shows.  They are so ridiculous, but they try so hard to be scientific.  I will actually give them points for that one.  They at least try.  The AAT do not even try.  They just make shit up.

    For example, they claim that Enkido from The Epic of Gilgamesh must have been a Bigfoot.  Because he was described as a hairy wild man.  Without getting into too much of an analysis of that story, let me just say that Enkido represents the uncivilized aspect of the world around Sumer during that time.  Gilgamesh has to go out and try to defeat the wild, yet cannot.  Instead he gives Enkido a girl and that tames the wild man.

    I honestly did not find too much to really care about the episode.  They were grasping at straws.  The only really far out theory was that the aliens built the Oregon caves in order to hide Bigfoot.  Seems reasonable to me.

    The other day when I was at Barnes and Noble I decided to pick up Philip Coppens book, The Ancient Alien Question.  I was intrigued as I read the first couple chapters.  He basically goes about disproving many of the theories.  Then I skipped ahead to his conclusion and he still believes in ancient aliens because of the proof in his book, which like the other "proof" is just misinterpretation. 


Weigh-In Wednesday VII

    Damn, I should have made this weigh-in Tuesday.  yesterday I was at 178.9.  This morning I was at 181.0.  I guess Tuesday would not work with the whole alliteration thing.  My stomach is starting to actually reduce in size.  Lindsey actually noticed it last night.  Pretty damn awesome if you ask me.

    The real question is, what should I do with my weekly Wednesday post?  I guess this will be a place where I give my opinion on something.  Or whatever.  Obviously I will post my weight...

    For Valentine's Day, Lindsey bought me a subscription to two magazines:  Biblical Archaeology Review and Archaeology.  I used to have a subscription to BAR, but I dropped it once they only focused on the James Ossuary and was solely focused on trying to prove that the ossuary was real.  I have believed from the beginning that the ossuary was a fake, but that it was probably forged a long time ago.  Probably someone from the James camp trying to prove that he was Jesus' brother.  That is neither here nor there though.

    Well there is another ossuary out there, apparently the Jonah Ossuary is the new big find.  You can go to Robert Cargill's blog to read more about it.  I am hoping that BAR does not hop onto this one as well.  This seems pretty clear if you read enough about the evidence. 

    So yeah, give these things a read.  Look into them.  Learn about stuff.  It can be fun.  I promise.

Standing Brooms

    Someone at work said something about being able to stand a broom up today because of some kind of planetary alignment or whatever.  I did not really think anything of it because most people are idiots.  I got home and looked on facebook and three people in a row had pictures of a broom standing up.

    I decided to try it for myself.  And as it turns out, a broom will stand up.  I noticed something though and mentioned it to Lindsey:  the broom seemed to stand on it's own because of the bristles spreading out and creating a base.  I also made a joke that it probably has something to do with an odd center of gravity.

    As it turns out, I was pretty much right.  Check it out.

2012: Idiot Gods

    The newest season of Ancient Aliens decided to deal with the Mayan end of the world prophecy, or at least how they never really said that at all.  They had to dig very deep to find the one monument that might mention the end of the world.

    Well the monument says that Bolon Yokte will be back that day and he was pretty much the god that was present during all of the other Mayan creation moments.  Or maybe it does not say that, I do not know, I am not a Mayan expert.  Anyways, the AAT folks have decided that Bolon Yokte must be the alien who will return.  And there evidence?  Aside from showing up during major creation events:  there is not much known about him.  Wow.  It truly is a scientific theory...

    I honestly hope this Bolon Yokte is an alien and that he comes back.  Just look at him:
    Dude has a mohawk and a chicken without a head.  Also, he has huge toenails.  Yep, this will be an awesome alien to hang out with...

Woolly Mammoth ALIVE!!!! Or not...

    I saw this over the weekend, it kept popping up on twitter and I even saw some folks post it on facebook.  Apparently a woolly mammoth was caught on video in Siberia...by a guy who is a paranormal investigator and has been linked to hoaxes before.  Does not sound suspicious at all, right?

    I like this video the best, since it also shows what it could possibly be.



    Yep, it really does look like a bear with a fish in it's mouth.  Not nearly as cool as a mammoth. 

10,000 Hours Later

    During this week's episode of Alcatraz, Sam Neill's character mentions to Dr. Soto (Hurley) that it takes 10,000 hours to become an expert on something.  This is not the first time I have heard this statement.  Is it true?  Where did it come from?  Is this another one of those "humans only use 10% of their brain's" myths?

    Anyways, I decided to do some research type "10,000 hour rule" into Google.  Apparently the idea comes from some psychologist (naturally he is Swedish, and this where you ask yourself "what does Josh have against the Swedes?") and I am guessing that if you read his original work on the matter, he is very specific and probably even says what I am about to say...but, who cares about that, this seems like something that I should mock.

    The reason that it is a popular idea is because of Malcolm Gladwell's book Outliers, where he talks about people who have become super great because of putting the time and effort into their field.  He uses Bill Gates as an example.  That one makes sense to me.  The one that does not make sense is The Beatles.  I honestly do not believe it was the fact that they practiced for over 10,000 hours in Germany is what made them huge music stars.

    Look, hard work is a huge part of success.  And the idea that if you put 10,000 hours of working in your own field, you will become an expert at it is probably true (especially if you break it down to something simple):  for example, if you are a barista (spell-check says this is not a word) at a coffee shop and you work there long enough to achieve the 10,000 hours (at 40 hours a week, at 50 weeks per year it would take 5 years), then you will most likely have mastered the art of making a soy latte. 

    Does this apply to everything in life though?  I want to become a master in the field of bench-pressing a car.  I will spend 10,000 hours trying to lift a car and at the end of all that hard work, still will not be able to lift a fucking car!  Hell, I could go about it two different ways:  I could go to a gym and work out everyday, just doing different bench-press exercises.  And at the end of the time, I could still not bench 2000 pounds.  Or what if I lay underneath my car everyday for 8 hours, pushing as hard as I can on my car...will it ever actually move?  Absolutely not.  I do not recommend trying this.

    I have decided that I am going to practice for 10,000 years on trying to win the slam-dunk contest...well, I think you get the point.

    Okay, maybe physical things do not actually work.  What about the piano?  I bet I could be pretty damn good at playing the piano if I practiced for 10,000 hours.  Yeah, I could play the piano, but could I actually compose a great piece of music?  Doubtful.

    So these are the things that Alcatraz causes me to spend time thinking about?  Definitely a keeper...

HAHAHAHAHA...Aliens

    I love these...


2012: Taking Advantage of the Idiots

    As I mentioned in a previous post, there is much I want to discuss concerning the end of the world.  Today we will look at the companies that take advantage of these people who believe in this sort of thing.  At first I thought these companies were terrible for preying on a person's fear over the uncertainty. 

    Then as I started to think about it, I came to another conclusion:  good for these companies.  If someone is idiotic enough to believe the world will end in December, then you deserve to lose some money to a smart businessperson. 

    Home Security
    The first company I heard about was Hardened Structures, which seems pretty cool when you start to look at some of their products.  Seriously, head over to the site and explore for a second.


    If you go to the 2012 section, you will see that they offer plenty of protection for when the inevitable happens.  They discuss what might possibly happen and how they plan to protect you from it.  These are the things this amazing structure will protect you from:


    • 3 Bar blast overpressure protection
    • Multiple Seismic Events
    • 100% waterproof
    • Blast doors
    • Fully Protected against EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) and HEMP (High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse). Fiberglass shelters cannot offer EMP/HEMP protection, see more at the bottom of the page.
    • 100% rust resistance (zinc anodes)
    • The best military grade NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) air filtration system available in the world (Temet)
    • Integrated emergency escape hatch
    I mean, just look at one of these things.  They look pretty damn awesome.  I might actually live in one myself.  Especially for those of you that know about my insane fear of windows. 

    They are developing these pods into full-size communities across the world, I have no idea if people have actually purchased them, but I would be willing to bet that a few have been purchased.  Also, the report that I saw also stated that Hardened Structures had been contracted to build arks, costing around $20 million dollars each for groups of very rich people.  These things can apparently survive at sea for like 5-10 years and can even submerge.  Pretty insane, right?

    Now, why do I think this is such a brilliant idea?  Well how could you prove that your shelter did not work.  I mean, if you pay this company millions of dollars for a house or an ark, how do you know if it will survive any of these things?  I mean, if the end of the world does come and your house actually does not protect you, it is not like you can sue the guy.  If the end of the world does not come, you will never know if your house works that way.  This company does not claim the end of the world is coming.  So smart...

    Personal Protection
    Again, at first I thought this one was pretty ridiculous.  This lady started a company that offers basic survival skills and weapons training for the upcoming apocalypse. 


    They charge $250, which seems pretty steep.  I mean, how hard is it to go to a gun range and practice shooting.  Or buy some books about survival and going out camping?  Granted this stuff would cost money, but you can usually find a way around that stuff.

    You can go around the site and see all sorts of interesting things.  I feel like she is taking advantage of people.  Then as I was looking at the founders page, I noticed something interesting.

    " I want all to know how grateful I am, for all those seeking training from SafeorSorry.net... It is a very important to me that you learn and practice our training, as well as other training. I want everyone to be able to protect themselves, especially women, mothers and children.... If you feel you can NOT afford my course please email me personally ( r.peterson@safeorsorry.net) with your story and I will give you the course for free, no problem, no questions asked."

    So she is willing to offer the course for free to women who cannot afford it?  Yeah, that makes her a pretty decent person.  And to be honest, it is not like these are terrible skills to have.

    Pet Service
    This one is aimed at the Rapture folks, but I am sure there will be a similar thing focused at the 2012 folks.


    If you go to the FAQ, you see that these people are atheists and that for $135, once the Rapture happens, they will pick up your pets and take care of them.  This one just cracks me up and like I said, I am sure they could retool this page or at least offer a 2012 End of the World deal.  Maybe people could upgrade their service for another $150 because obviously, if the world comes to an end and shit gets crazy, it will take a little more money for one of these care providers to reach your pet...

    I need to think of my own smart business idea to scam these believers out of their hard-earned cash. 

Interceptions and My Idiotic Perception

     The other night I was out with Jason and we were having a discussion about quarterbacks.  I made a comment about how I think defensive backs will eventually benefit from this new passing heavy league.  My idea was that if there more passes being thrown, then it should make sense that there will be more interceptions.  Jason argued with me and feels that it is a horrible time for defensive backs.

    I figured (and I think towards the end of a very long rant that Jason agreed with me) that if QBs are throwing way more passes and the rate of interceptions stays relatively the same over time, that there should be more total interceptions.  My reasoning was that if you looked back at the old days, there were less passes thrown, but aside from a few outliers, interception numbers would probably be pretty low as well.

    I was completely wrong.  I am actually shocked by what I found.  Here is the data:  INT is interceptions, the next column is interceptions per team per game, the next one is pass attempts, after that we have pass attempts per team per game, and last we have the percentage of passes thrown for interception (or interception per attempt).




    Year INT INT/Tm/Gm Pass Attempts PA/Tm/Gm Int/Attempt
    2011 506 0.9882 17410 34.0039 2.9064%
    2010 511 0.9980 17269 33.7285 2.9591%
    2009 525 1.0254 17033 33.2676 3.0823%
    2008 465 0.9082 16526 32.2773 2.8137%
    2007 720 1.4063 17045 33.2910 4.2241%
    2006 520 1.0156 16389 32.0098 3.1729%
    2005 506 0.9883 16464 32.1563 3.0734%
    2004 524 1.0234 16354 31.9414 3.2041%
    2003 538 1.0508 16493 32.2129 3.2620%
    2002 528 1.0313 17292 33.7734 3.0534%
    2001 545 1.0988 16181 32.6230 3.3681%
    2000 634 1.2782 16322 32.9073 3.8843%
    1999 562 1.1331 16760 33.7903 3.3532%
    1998 509 1.0604 15489 32.2688 3.2862%
    1997 479 0.9979 15729 32.7688 3.0453%
    1996 542 1.1292 15966 33.2625 3.3947%
    1995 512 1.0667 16699 34.7896 3.0661%
    1994 474 1.0580 15056 33.6071 3.1482%
    1993 469 1.0469 14414 32.1741 3.2538%
    1992 519 1.1585 13408 29.9286 3.8708%
    1991 488 1.0893 13950 31.1384 3.4982%
    1990 480 1.0714 13516 30.1696 3.5513%
    1989 559 1.2478 14338 32.0045 3.8987%
    1988 553 1.2344 14131 31.5424 3.9134%
    1987 540 1.2054 13491 30.1138 4.0027%
    1986 581 1.2969 14469 32.2969 4.0155%
    1985 602 1.3438 14423 32.1942 4.1739%
    1984 584 1.3036 14325 31.9754 4.0768%
    1983 620 1.3839 14047 31.3549 4.4138%
    1982 349 1.3849 7933 31.4802 4.3993%
    1981 609 1.3594 14180 31.6518 4.2948%
    1980 627 1.3996 13705 30.5915 4.5750%
    1979 597 1.3326 12979 28.9710 4.5997%
    1978 639 1.4263 11829 26.4040 5.4020%
    1977 562 1.4337 9786 24.9643 5.7429%
    1976 497 1.2679 10260 26.1735 4.8441%
    1975 533 1.4643 9973 27.3984 5.3444%
    1974 500 1.3736 9609 26.3984 5.2035%
    1973 470 1.2912 8845 24.2995 5.3137%
    1972 480 1.3187 9011 24.7555 5.3268%
    1971 544 1.4945 9412 25.8571 5.7799%
    1970 510 1.4011 9796 26.9121 5.2062%
    1969 544 1.4945 10377 28.5082 5.2424%
    1968 554 1.5220 10034 27.5659 5.5212%
    1967 593 1.6943 10329 29.5114 5.7411%
    1966 535 1.5923 10090 30.0298 5.3023%
    1965 480 1.5584 9059 29.4123 5.2986%
    1964 501 1.6266 9187 29.8279 5.4534%
    1963 514 1.6688 8954 29.0714 5.7405%
    1962 567 1.8409 8812 28.6104 6.4344%
    1961 564 1.8312 8922 28.9675 6.3215%
    1960 493 1.8396 7813 29.1530 6.3100%
    1959 221 1.5347 3714 25.7917 5.9505%
    1958 243 1.6874 3951 27.4375 6.1503%
    1957 231 1.6042 3339 23.1875 6.9182%
    1956 240 1.6667 3282 22.7917 7.3126%
    1955 258 1.7917 3820 26.5278 6.7539%
    1954 294 2.0417 4232 29.3889 6.9471%
    1953 306 2.1250 4267 29.6319 7.1713%
    1952 297 2.0625 4024 27.9444 7.3807%
    1951 288 2.0000 3881 26.9514 7.4208%
    1950 343 2.1987 4307 27.6090 7.9638%

    I realize it looks like a lot to digest, so I was nice and made some graphs.







    A few quick notes:  1982 was a shortened season, only nine games were played.  From 2011-2002 there were 32 teams that played 16 games.  From 2001-1999 there were 31 teams.  1998-1995 30 teams.  1994-1978 28 teams.  1977-1976 28 teams playing 14 games.  1975-1970 26 teams playing 14 games.  1969-1960 was the AFL-NFL times (I had to combine the numbers, the majority of the time they both played 14 games, except in 1960 when the NFL only played 12 games).  From 1959-1951 there were 12 teams playing 12 games and in 1950 there were 13 teams that played 12 games.

    Here is the interesting thing, the number interceptions has stayed pretty steady since the 1960s.  In fact, as the number of attempts increases over time, the rate of interceptions decreases.  To me that seems pretty crazy, but I guess it should make sense if you take into consideration that coaches must know what they are doing.  I mean, if all these QBs were pretty crappy, they probably would want them to continuing throwing less.  Also, there are the rule changes to take into consideration.  I am not about to go that deep into this.

    I am shocked that coaches passed at all in the 1950s, teams were averaging two interceptions per game and there was almost an 8% chance of an attempt being picked off.

    I guess being a defensive back in this era must really suck.